|
Hotshotter3000 (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
Walt Disney. You can criticize them all you want as a company, even the content of their films (even if it isn't their fault the stories are that way), but one thing you can't argue with is that the quality of their animation was, is, and always will be, amazing.
Danny77uk (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
More like a month.
KayoKsaKayo (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
Wow, this shows how early CGI was, but the character animation was top notch.
tbrown8890 (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
that was actually very unique in look...so different...I think it would be interesting to watch.
SexyGirlsSmoke (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
1983 man!
josswhedon692 (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
this is offensively charmless
St4rdog (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
Why wouldn't they have made this? I guess it's true that Eisner was an idiot. He would've had a say on this around that exact time.
nmitchell98405 (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
Wow..I did not know this technology was possible until Disney's "Beauty and the "Beast" was realeased...thanks for posting!
BlueDragon992 (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
This how Disney SHOULD have done cgi animation!
Snurremegrundt (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
This was also an early example on digital coloring, which would later give rise to the famous CAPS system. But in the days when this test was made, it was not considred to be good enough. |
