|
hogsonquads (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
Someones mowing the lawn!
funkchunck (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
yep i totaly agree with you,but sure all sane people know that creationists are crazy anyway and talking to them is pretty much a waste of time because they only hear what they want to hear,well i guess thats what years of brainwashing will do to you.
Eskon2 (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
I have googled it. I didnt encounter the information u were talking about it could realy help if you found your source again.
TheBigGameHunter1 (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
"You came up with a WRONG idea(As if creations have correct ones)that chimps evolved from Humans,this is proven wrong by the Dead virii in the DNA, so next lame excuse please!""One could be decendant of the other." No as I said before this does not match the evidence, you dont accept evolution arnt going accept the truth. so whats the point of explaining it yet again to you? for the 6 th time? Want to find out go google and read it online!
Eskon2 (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
You came up with a WRONG idea(As if creations have correct ones)that chimps evolved from Humans,this is proven wrong by the Dead virii in the DNA, so next lame excuse please!I nowhere read this. Is there any information your holding back. All you said uppon now was they shared dead retrovirri and some %numebers on the number of dead retrovirri matching.No if its true there more options open.One could be decendant of the other.
TheBigGameHunter1 (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
"I dont denied the simularity in retroviri of chimps and humans.U just make up one conclusion for your own opinion.I however look at all possibility."You came up with a WRONG idea(As if creations have correct ones)that chimps evolved from Humans,this is proven wrong by the Dead virii in the DNA, so next lame excuse please!"In fact the number of options is nearly endless."WOW but which one does the evidence show? The retro virri in the DNA show we have a common ancestor with chimps.
Eskon2 (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
You say there holes you wont point at them. I dont denied the simularity in retrovirri of chimps and humans. U just make up one conclusion for your own opinion. I however look at all possibilitys. For actual concrete evidense. You need to examin te whole tree of apes and humans and not just calculate the simularitys but the differences ass well. My story is giving it another way. In fact the number of options is nearly endless.
TheBigGameHunter1 (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
"Well its as good an fact possible. Its just there is no model where it fits in isnt it?I am maybe to determined to point at the holes. "There is no holes only in your crazy story. Just because you refuse to accept the retro viris DNA evidence, doesnt make it not true!
Eskon2 (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
Well its as good an fact possible. Its just there is no model where it fits in isnt it?I am maybe to determined to point at the holes.
TheBigGameHunter1 (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
"Well i can say the human is the common ancestor. and the ape is some failure ofspring:P"The good old creationist ignore the evidence/proof then make up some crap!You obviously dont want to undertsnad or are completely stupid. |
