|
cheeseburger04 (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
i'm sorry has the t-90 been proven against anything sorry but i am not going to take an opinion of a country that supports a communist president
ruggs1515 (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
i dont care what anybody say about the damn t-90 it aint shit compared to an abrams. and i will let the facts out- the abrams is better protected and better electronics. the t-90s missle aint gonna do nothin to an abrams. Plus with the u.s. army deciding to use TUSK almost as primary armor considering that the added ERA adds the abrams survivability. the t90 has an era that the old DU round could not penetrait so the army came out with the new DU round and i have the say La La Later! to the T-90
hkusp45compact (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
same cannon as the abrams fucktard
g36c1 (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
The LEOA6 IS THE BEST TANK IN THE WORLD HAS THE BEST MAIN CANON IN THE WORLD THE RHEIMMENTAL L55. can destroy abrams t 90 s everything
seriousmtb (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
Ineffective? What do do you mean? In modern local conflicts it much harder without tanks, than with them. Imagine Americans in Iraq and Russians in Chechnya without tanks, they would be still assaulting capital cities. And all normal countries prepare they tanks and tank crews BEFORE war, only banana countries put badly-trained people and degraded technic into battle. And no one cares, what are fighting with tanks, they are fighting the enemy, no difference, is is it trained/equipped, or not.
Keffy3000 (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
Yeah, this argument is stupid, all tanks are generally ineffective in modern wars, they are only supposed to be efective against big targets. They're fighting under-equiped, un-trained, hidden enemies. Both tanks are good (Abrams and T90) but they're not in conflicts where they're practical
rusak24 (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
From Wiki- Bumper B-23 TF 1-37, 1st Armored Division - Large caliber shaped charge, then hit by an unknown round, likely a KE (non-DU)- Two hits, one on the rear grills, another penetrated both sides of the hull. Catastrophic damage by fire. Check it out theres more.
hkusp45compact (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
still has been proven the t-90 isnt fighting other tanks in chechyna so fuckin can it man and show me proof that an rpg took out an abrams and i will take you to the worlds most expensive strip club and pay for it all
rusak24 (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
Proven against what? Old, inferior, under equipped armys? You think Sadam had new, highly trained tanks? hahaha Abrams is not proven, they are fighting against a guy wearing a burlap sack and armed with an RPG, and still lossing. If thats what you call proven, then so is the T-90. It is fighting in Chechnya right now, against similar burlap sacks, so that makes it proven too right?
hkusp45compact (January 1, 1970 at 11:59 am)
maybe a better range than the round the T-90 shoots bottom line is its not proven in battle and the abrams is so that makes the abrams the best whatever is on paper doesnt meant shit |
